Baby, the one and only

Hey I'm writing a review now because I haven't in a while.

I think the picture is very nice, it's someone's original interpretation of a character that is, otherwise, quite non-child-friendly -- She looks like she could actually be the mascot of some sort of Pizza Restaurant where completely child-friendly and not-murdery things happen. The shine makes her look plastic in some areas, and in other areas, the shine is a bit more dimmed, making it appear like a different material, which is a nice effect in my opinion -- The arms and the dress looks like cloth, while the shirt, the hair, and the head, look like plastic or metal. Although I dislike Five Nights at Freddy's, I think this picture is very nice.

Arbitrary numerical rating/Arbitrary numerical rating.

Reasons for Ratings;
Vision; I have no idea what the hell this means, I guess it means what the artist wanted to make? I dunno. It's clearly Baby from that new Five Nights game, nothing to really argue about that. 4.5 because I have no fucking idea what "Vision" means.

Originality; It's from a video game, so obviously that loses a bit of the originality, but it is an original representation of an existing character. I'd say a solid 3.5. No, not because it's FNaF, just because it's an existing character.

Technique; I just like the style, fuck you. 5.

Impact; I think this means "Cultural Impact" or something? I have no idea. Maybe the message behind the picture? No idea. If it's the former, Five Nights at Freddy's is absolutely criminally famous, then I guess it has a relatively high impact, but it doesn't impact me so much. I was interested, just a bit, in the story of FNaF at first, but then I just got sick of it. If it is the latter, it's a fan-art -- I don't think there's even supposed to be some sort of message. I guess I'll say 3 because it's still a decently high score but it's also not perfect, plus I have no idea what Impact means in terms of artwork. 3.

That's the critique.